¶ 7.05.012    Dependent Claim(s)  - Rejection, 35 U.S.C. 101, Non-Statutory Method (Abstract Idea)

Dependent claim(s) [1] when analyzed as a whole are held to be patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. 101  because the additional recited limitation(s) fail(s) to establish that the claim(s) is/are not directed to an abstract idea, as detailed below:  [2]

Examiner Note:

1.        This form paragraph should only be used when rejecting dependent method claim(s) directed to an abstract idea.

2.        In bracket 2, provide an explanation as to why the claim(s) is/are directed to an abstract idea; for instance, that the additional limitations are no more than a field of use or merely involve insignificant extrasolution activity; e.g., data gathering.  The explanation needs to be sufficient to establish a prima facie case of patent ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101.