1203.02(f)    Cases Which May Be Cited

Prior to January 23, 2007, the Board’s policy had been that decisions which were not designated as "citable as precedent" or "for publication in full" were not citable authority. [ Note 1.] Since January 23, 2007, the Board has permitted citation to any Board decision. [ Note 2.] However, the practice of citing decisions designated as "not a precedent" is not encouraged because they are not binding upon the Board, nor are they a substitute for evidence needed to support or traverse a refusal. [ Note 3.] Nonetheless, such decisions may be cited for whatever persuasive value they might have. [ Note 4.] See TBMP § 101.03.

When cases are cited in a brief, the case citation should include a citation to the USPQ if the case has appeared in that publication. [ Note 5.] See TBMP § 101.03 andTBMP § 801.03. Citation to a non-precedential case may be to TTABVUE by docket entry and page number.

NOTES:

 1.   In re A La Vieille Russie Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1895, 1897 n.2 (TTAB 2001); In re Polo International Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1061, 1063 n.3 (TTAB 1999); In re Caterpillar Inc., 43 USPQ2d 1335, 1337 (TTAB 1997); General Mills Inc. v. Health Valley Foods, 24 USPQ2d 1270, 1275 n.9 (TTAB 1992).

 2.   Citation of Opinions to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, O.G. Notice (Jan. 23, 2007).

 3.   See, e.g., In re UST Global (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 2020 USPQ2d 10435, at *7 n.23 (TTAB 2020) (non-precedential decisions are not binding on the Board, nor a substitute for evidence needed to support a refusal); In re tapio GmbH, 2020 USPQ2d 11387, at *10 n.30 (TTAB 2020) ("Generally, the practice of citing non-precedential opinions is not encouraged." Board found unpersuasive non-precedential decisions decided on different records); In re Society of Health and Physical Educators, 127 USPQ2d 1584, 1587 n.7 (TTAB 2018) ("Board decisions which are not designated as precedent are not binding on the Board, but may be cited and considered for whatever persuasive value they may hold."); In re Morrison & Foerster LLP, 110 USPQ2d 1423, 1427, n.6 (TTAB 2014) ("Although parties may cite to non-precedential decisions, the Board does not encourage the practice."); In re the Procter & Gamble Co., 105 USPQ2d 1119, 1120-21 (TTAB 2012) (citation to non-precedential opinions permitted but not encouraged; non-precedential decisions not binding on the Board).

 4.   See In re Society of Health and Physical Educators, 127 USPQ2d 1584, 1587 n.7 (TTAB 2018) ("Board decisions which are not designated as precedent are not binding on the Board, but may be cited and considered for whatever persuasive value they may hold.").

 5.   In re Carlson, 91 USPQ2d 1198, 1199 n.2 (TTAB 2009). Bloomberg Law ceased publishing the USPQ in print form in December 2018.