111.02(e)    No Receipt of Correspondence Bearing Certificate

In the event that correspondence intended for the USPTO is timely filed with an appropriate certificate of mailing, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 2.197, but is not received in the Office, and there is a resulting Office action, in a proceeding or an application, which is adverse to the submitting party, the correspondence will be considered timely if the party which submitted it (1) informs the Office of the previous mailing of the correspondence promptly after becoming aware that the Office has no evidence of receipt of the correspondence, (2) supplies an additional copy of the previously mailed correspondence and certificate, and (3) includes a statement attesting, on a personal knowledge basis or to the satisfaction of the Director, to the previous timely mailing. The statement must be verified if it is made by a person other than a practitioner, as that term is defined in 37 C.F.R. § 11.1. See also TBMP § 107 (How and Where to File Papers and Fees). [ Note 1.] Documents may not be filed with the Board by facsimile transmission, and any document so filed will not be accepted. [ Note 2.]

For lost or misplaced correspondence intended for the Board, the evidence required by 37 C.F.R. § 2.197(b)  should be submitted to the Board for consideration. If the requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 2.197(b)  cannot be met, the only alternative is a petition to the Director.

NOTES:

 1.   37 C.F.R. § 2.197(b).

 2.   37 C.F.R. § 2.190  and 37 C.F.R. § 2.195(d)(3).