533.03 When Motion to Strike Should Not Be Filed
The Board does not ordinarily strike testimony taken in accordance with the applicable rules on the basis of substantive objections; rather, such objections are considered by the Board in its evaluation of the probative value of the testimony at final hearing. [ Note 1.] Objections to testimony depositions on grounds other than the ground of untimeliness, or the ground of improper or inadequate notice, generally should not be raised by motion to strike. Rather, the objections should simply be made in writing at the time specified in the applicable rules, and orally "on the record" at the taking of the deposition, as appropriate. [ Note 2.] See TBMP § 707.03(c). Such objections must be maintained in the objecting party’s brief, or they are considered to have been waived. [ Note 3.]
NOTES:
1.Board Board of Regents, University of Texas System v. Southern Illinois Miners, LLC, 110 USPQ2d 1182, 1194 n.19 (TTAB 2014); Alcatraz Media, Inc. v. Chesapeake Marine Tours, Inc., 107 USPQ2d 1750, 1755 (TTAB 2013), aff’d, 565 F. App’x 900 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (mem.); Krause v. Krause Publications Inc., 76 USPQ2d 1904, 1907 (TTAB 2005); Marshall Field & Co. v. Mrs. Fields Cookies, 25 USPQ2d 1321, 1326 (TTAB 1992).
2. See Wet Seal Inc. v. FD Management Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1629, 1632 (TTAB 2007); Hard Rock Café International (USA) Inc. v. Elsea, 56 USPQ2d 1504, 1507 n.5 (TTAB 2000) (objection to exhibit raised during deposition but not maintained in brief deemed waived); Reflange Inc. v. R-Con International, 17 USPQ2d 1125, 1126 n.4 (TTAB 1990).
3. See Wet Seal Inc. v. FD Management Inc., 82 USPQ2d 1629, 1632 (TTAB 2007); Hard Rock Café International (USA) Inc. v. Elsea, 56 USPQ2d 1504, 1507 n.5 (TTAB 2000) (objection to exhibit raised during deposition but not maintained in brief deemed waived).