1713.02 Failure to Respond to Notice Granting Additional Time to Perfect Response or to Denial of Request for Reconsideration with Time Remaining
If an examining attorney issues an action granting an applicant additional time to complete a response under 37 C.F.R. §2.65(b) (see TMEP §718.03), or a "Request for Reconsideration Denied – No Appeal Filed - Time Remaining" (or, if appropriate, "SU - Request for Reconsideration Denied – No Appeal Filed - Time Remaining") action, and the applicant does not receive the action or fails to timely respond due to some extraordinary circumstance, and the application is abandoned for failure to file a complete response, the applicant may file a petition to the Director under 37 C.F.R. §2.146 to reverse the holding of abandonment and reinstate the application.
If the applicant submits the response with the petition and the petition is granted, the Director will instruct the examining attorney to review the response. If the applicant does not submit the response and the petition is granted, the USPTO will send a notice to the applicant directing the applicant to view the action on the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval ("TSDR") portal on the USPTO website at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/, and providing the applicant with a new 30-day period in which to perfect the response.
However, if an examining attorney issues an Office action granting an applicant additional time to complete a response when it appears that a response is signed by an improper party, and the applicant fails to complete the response within the time granted or remaining, the examining attorney must hold the application abandoned for failure to file a complete response. See TMEP §§715.03(b), 718.03, and 718.03(b). If the applicant wishes to submit evidence that an authorized party signed the original response, the applicant may petition the Director to reverse the holding and reinstate the application under 37 C.F.R. §2.146. If the evidence establishes that a proper party signed the response, the Director will grant the petition and instruct the examining attorney to review the response. If, however, the evidence establishes that the response was signed by an unauthorized party, the Director will find (1) that the application should have been abandoned for failure to respond, (2) that the petition will be construed as a petition to revive under 37 C.F.R.§2.66, (3) that revival based on unintentional delay is proper, and (4) that a response signed by a proper party must be submitted. To expedite revival in this situation, a properly signed response should be submitted with the petition.
The granting of the petition does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal or filing a petition to review the examining attorney’s action under 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b). 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.142(a). Therefore, in most circumstances, if the response does not overcome all outstanding refusals or satisfy all outstanding requirements, the application will again be abandoned for failure to file a complete response (but see TMEP §1714.01(a)(ii) regarding petition to revive for failure to respond to a final action).